Treasury Regulations · 26 CFR
§ 1.148-3. General arbitrage rebate rules.
Regulation text, no changes From the eCFR, current as of October 15, 2026. The eCFR is an authoritative but unofficial editorial compilation of the Code of Federal Regulations; the official text is the annual CFR on govinfo. Compare it with this section on ecfr.gov (external site) or the official annual CFR on govinfo (external site).
Regulation under 26 U.S.C. § 148
Cite as 26 CFR § 1.148-3
At a glance
Read from the text and its source citation. Not part of the regulation.
- Status
- In the current eCFR
- Issued
- June 18, 1993 by T.D. 8476
- Last amended
- July 18, 2016 by T.D. 9777
- Issued under
- 26 U.S.C. § 148
- Length
- 3,468 words · about 15 min to read
- Cross-references
- cites 3 Code sections and 3 regulations; cited by 12
(i) Facts. On January 1, 1994, City A issues a fixed yield issue and invests all the sale proceeds of the issue ($49 million). There are no other gross proceeds. The issue has a yield of 7.0000 percent per year compounded semiannually (computed on a 30 day month/360 day year basis). City A receives amounts from the investment and immediately expends them for the governmental purpose of the issue as follows:
| Date | Amount |
|---|---|
| 2/1/94 | $3,000,000 |
| 5/1/94 | 5,000,000 |
| 1/1/95 | 5,000,000 |
| 9/1/95 | 20,000,000 |
| 3/1/96 | 22,000,000 |
(ii) First computation date. (A) City A chooses January 1, 1999, as its first computation date. This date is the latest date that may be used to compute the first required rebate installment payment. The rebate amount as of this date is computed by determining the future value of the receipts and the payments for the investment. The compounding interval is each 6-month (or shorter) period and the 30 day month/360 day year basis is used because these conventions were used to compute yield on the issue. The future value of these amounts, plus the computation credit, as of January 1, 1999, is:
| Date | Receipts (payments) | FV (7.0000 percent) |
|---|---|---|
| 1/1/94 | ($49,000,000) | ($69,119,339) |
| 2/1/94 | 3,000,000 | 4,207,602 |
| 5/1/94 | 5,000,000 | 6,893,079 |
| 1/1/95 | 5,000,000 | 6,584,045 |
| 1/1/95 | (1,000) | (1,317) |
| 9/1/95 | 20,000,000 | 25,155,464 |
| 1/1/96 | (1,000) | 1,229) |
| 3/1/96 | 22,000,000 | 26,735,275 |
| 1/1/97 | (1,000) | (1,148) |
| Rebate amount (1/01/99) | 452,432 |
(B) City A pays 90 percent of the rebate amount ($407,189) to the United States within 60 days of January 1, 1999.
(iii) Second computation date. (A) On the next required computation date, January 1, 2004, the future value of the payments and receipts is:
| Date | Receipts (payments) | FV (7.0000 percent) |
|---|---|---|
| 1/1/99 | $452,432 | $638,200 |
| Rebate amount (1/01/04) | 638,200 |
(B) As of this computation date, the future value of the payment treated as made on January 1, 1999, is $574,380, which equals at least 90 percent of the rebate amount as of this computation date ($638,200 × 0.9), and thus no additional rebate payment is due as of this date.
(iv) Final computation date. (A) On January 1, 2009, City A redeems all the bonds, and thus this date is the final computation date. The future value of the receipts and payments as of this date is:
| Date | Receipts (payments) | FV (7.0000 percent) |
|---|---|---|
| 1/1/04 | $638,200 | $900,244 |
| 1/1/09 | (1,000) | (1,000) |
| Rebate amount (1/01/09) | 899,244 |
(B) As of this computation date, the future value of the payment made on January 1, 1999, is $810,220 and thus an additional rebate payment of $89,024 is due. This payment reflects the future value of the 10 percent unpaid portion, and thus would not be owed had the issuer paid the full rebate amount as of any prior computation date.
(i) Facts. On July 1, 1994, City B issues a variable yield issue and invests all of the sale proceeds of the issue ($30 million). There are no other gross proceeds. As of July 1, 1999, there are nonpurpose investments allocated to the issue. Prior to July 1, 1999, City B receives amounts from nonpurpose investments and immediately expends them for the governmental purpose of the issue as follows:
| Date | Amount |
|---|---|
| 8/1/1994 | $5,000,000 |
| 7/1/1995 | 8,000,000 |
| 12/1/1995 | 17,000,000 |
| 7/1/1999 | 650,000 |
(ii) First computation date. (A) City B treats the last day of the fifth bond year (July 1, 1999) as a computation date. The yield on the variable yield issue during the first computation period (the period beginning on the issue date and ending on the first computation date) is 6.0000 percent per year compounded semiannually. The value of the nonpurpose investments allocated to the issue as of July 1, 1999, is $3 million. The rebate amount as of July 1, 1999, is computed by determining the future value of the receipts and the payments for the nonpurpose investments. The compounding interval is each 6-month (or shorter) period and the 30 day month/360 day year basis is used because these conventions were used to compute yield on the issue. The future value of these amounts and of the computation date credits as of July 1, 1999, is:
| Date | Receipts (payments) | FV (6.0000 percent) |
|---|---|---|
| 7/1/1994 | ($30,000,000) | ($40,317,491) |
| 8/1/1994 | 5,000,000 | 6,686,560 |
| 7/1/1995 | (1,000) | (1,267) |
| 7/1/1995 | 8,000,000 | 10,134,161 |
| 12/1/1995 | 17,000,000 | 21,011,112 |
| 7/1/1996 | (1,000) | (1,194) |
| 7/1/1997 | (1,000) | (1,126) |
| 7/1/1998 | (1,000) | (1,061) |
| 7/1/1999 | 3,000,000 | 3,000,000 |
| 7/1/1999 | 650,000 | 650,000 |
| 7/1/1999 | (1,000) | (1,000) |
| Rebate amount (7/01/1999) | 1,158,694 |
(B) City B pays 90 percent of the rebate amount ($1,042,824.60) to the United States within 60 days of July 1, 1999.
(iii) Next computation date. (A) On July 1, 2004, City B redeems all of the bonds. Thus, the next computation date is July 1, 2004. On July 30, 1999, City B chose to compute rebate for periods following the first computation period by treating the end of each fifth bond year as a computation date. The yield during the second computation period is 5.0000 percent per year compounded semiannually. The computation of the rebate amount as of this date reflects the value of the nonpurpose investments allocated to the issue at the end of the prior computation period. On July 1, 2004, City B sells those nonpurpose investments for $3,925,000 and expends that amount for the governmental purpose of the issue.
(B) As of July 1, 2004, the future value of the rebate amount computed as of July 1, 1999, and of all other payments and receipts is:
| Date | Receipts (payments) | FV (5.0000 percent) |
|---|---|---|
| 7/1/1999 | $1,158,694 | $1,483,226 |
| 7/1/1999 | (3,000,000) | (3,840,254) |
| 7/1/2000 | (1,000) | (1,218) |
| 7/1/2001 | (1,000) | (1,160) |
| 7/1/2002 | (1,000) | (1,104) |
| 7/1/2003 | (1,000) | (1,051) |
| 7/1/2004 | (2,000) | (2,000) |
| 7/1/2004 | 3,925,000 | 3,925,000 |
| 1,561,439 |
(C) As of this computation date, the future value of the payment made on July 1, 1999, is $1,334,904 and thus an additional rebate payment of $226,535 is due.
(D) If the yield during the second computation period were, instead, 7.0000 percent, the rebate amount computed as of July 1, 2004, would be $1,320,891. The future value of the payment made on July 1, 1999, would be $1,471,007. Although the future value of the payment made on July 1, 1999 ($1,471,007), exceeds the rebate amount computed as of July 1, 2004 ($1,320,891), § 1.148-3(i) limits the amount recoverable as a defined overpayment of rebate under section 148 to the excess of the total “amount paid” over the sum of the amount determined under the future value method to be the “rebate amount” as of the most recent computation date and all other amounts that are otherwise required to be paid under section 148 as of the date the recovery is requested. Because the total amount that the issuer paid on July 1, 1999 ($1,042,824.60), does not exceed the rebate amount as of July 1, 2004 ($1,320,891), the issuer would not be entitled to recover any overpayment of rebate in this case.
[T.D. 8476, 58 FR 33522, June 18, 1993; 58 FR 44452, Aug. 23, 1993, as amended by T.D. 8538, 59 FR 24042, May 10, 1994; T.D. 8476, 59 FR 24350, May 11, 1994; T.D. 8718, 62 FR 25507, May 9, 1997; T.D. 9701, 79 FR 67351, Nov. 13, 2014; T.D. 9777, 81 FR 46593, July 18, 2016]
Cross-references
Computed from the citations in the text of 26 CFR.
Code sections it cites
Regulations it cites
- § 1.148-5 Yield and valuation of investments.
- § 1.148-6 General allocation and accounting rules.
- § 1.148-7 Spending exceptions to the rebate requirement.
Cited by 12 other regulations
- § 1.148-0 Scope and table of contents.
- § 1.148-1 Definitions and elections.
- § 1.148-4 Yield on an issue of bonds.
- § 1.148-5 Yield and valuation of investments.
- § 1.148-6 General allocation and accounting rules.
- § 1.148-7 Spending exceptions to the rebate requirement.
- § 1.148-9 Arbitrage rules for refunding issues.
- § 1.148-10 Anti-abuse rules and authority of Commissioner.
- § 1.148-11 Effective/applicability dates.
- § 1.149(d)-1 Limitations on advance refundings.
- § 1.148-11A Effective dates.
- § 1.1397E-1 Qualified zone academy bonds.
Amendment history
From the source citation at the end of the section, newest first. T.D. is a Treasury decision; FR is the Federal Register.
- Amended by T.D. 9777 (81 FR 46593)
- Amended by T.D. 9701 (79 FR 67351)
- Amended by T.D. 8718 (62 FR 25507)
- Amended by T.D. 8476 (59 FR 24350)
- Amended by T.D. 8538 (59 FR 24042)
- Amended (58 FR 44452)
- Issued by T.D. 8476 (58 FR 33522)
Where it sits in 26 CFR
- Subchapter A Income tax
- Part 1 Income taxes
- Tax Exemption Requirements for State and Local Bonds
Nearby sections
- § 1.147(f)-1 Public approval of private activity bonds.
- § 1.148-0 Scope and table of contents.
- § 1.148-1 Definitions and elections.
- § 1.148-2 General arbitrage yield restriction rules.
- § 1.148-3 General arbitrage rebate rules.
- § 1.148-4 Yield on an issue of bonds.
- § 1.148-5 Yield and valuation of investments.
- § 1.148-6 General allocation and accounting rules.
- § 1.148-7 Spending exceptions to the rebate requirement.