Treasury Regulations · 26 CFR
§ 1.1312-4. Double disallowance of a deduction or credit.
Regulation text, no changes From the eCFR, current as of October 15, 2026. The eCFR is an authoritative but unofficial editorial compilation of the Code of Federal Regulations; the official text is the annual CFR on govinfo. Compare it with this section on ecfr.gov (external site) or the official annual CFR on govinfo (external site).
Regulation under 26 U.S.C. § 1312
Cite as 26 CFR § 1.1312-4
At a glance
Read from the text and its source citation. Not part of the regulation.
- Status
- In the current eCFR
- Issued
- November 26, 1960 by T.D. 6500
- Issued under
- 26 U.S.C. § 1312
- Length
- 383 words · about 2 min to read
- Cross-references
- cites 1 Code section and 1 regulation; cited by 2
The taxpayer, A, who computes his income by use of the accrual method of accounting, deducted in his return for the taxable year 1951 an item of expense which he paid in such year. At the time A filed his return for 1951, the statute of limitations for 1950 had not expired. Subsequently, the Commissioner asserted a deficiency for 1951 based on the position that the liability for such expense should have been accrued for the taxable year 1950. In 1955, after the period of limitations on refunds for 1950 had expired, there was a determination by the Tax Court disallowing such deduction for the taxable year 1951. A is entitled to an adjustment for the taxable year 1950. However, if such liability should have been accrued for the taxable year 1946 instead of 1950, A would not be entitled to an adjustment, if a credit or refund with respect to 1946 was already barred when he deducted such expense for the taxable year 1951.
The taxpayer, B, in his return for 1951 claimed a deduction for a charitable contribution. The Commissioner asserted a deficiency for such year contending that 50 percent of the deduction should be disallowed, since the contribution was made from community property 50 percent of which was attributable to B's spouse. The deficiency is sustained by the Tax Court in 1956, subsequent to the period of limitations within which B's spouse could claim a refund with respect to 1951. An adjustment is permitted to B's spouse, a related taxpayer, since a refund attributable to a deduction by her of such contribution was not barred when B claimed the deduction.
[T.D. 6500, 25 FR 12034, Nov. 26, 1960]
Cross-references
Computed from the citations in the text of 26 CFR.
Code sections it cites
Regulations it cites
Cited by 2 other regulations
Amendment history
From the source citation at the end of the section, newest first. T.D. is a Treasury decision; FR is the Federal Register.
- Issued by T.D. 6500 (25 FR 12034)
Where it sits in 26 CFR
- Subchapter A Income tax
- Part 1 Income taxes
- Readjustment of Tax Between Years and Special Limitations
Nearby sections
- § 1.1311(b)-3 Existence of relationship in case of adjustment by way of deficiency assessment.
- § 1.1312-1 Double inclusion of an item of gross income.
- § 1.1312-2 Double allowance of a deduction or credit.
- § 1.1312-3 Double exclusion of an item of gross income.
- § 1.1312-4 Double disallowance of a deduction or credit.
- § 1.1312-5 Correlative deductions and inclusions for trusts or estates and legatees, beneficiaries, or heirs.
- § 1.1312-6 Correlative deductions and credits for certain related corporations.
- § 1.1312-7 Basis of property after erroneous treatment of a prior transaction.
- § 1.1312-8 Law applicable in determination of error.