Treasury Regulations · 26 CFR
§ 1.1502-16. Mine exploration expenditures.
Regulation text, no changes From the eCFR, current as of October 15, 2026. The eCFR is an authoritative but unofficial editorial compilation of the Code of Federal Regulations; the official text is the annual CFR on govinfo. Compare it with this section on ecfr.gov (external site) or the official annual CFR on govinfo (external site).
Regulation under 26 U.S.C. § 1502
Cite as 26 CFR § 1.1502-16
At a glance
Read from the text and its source citation. Not part of the regulation.
- Status
- In the current eCFR
- Issued
- June 30, 1972 by T.D. 7192
- Issued under
- 26 U.S.C. § 1502
- Length
- 1,412 words · about 6 min to read
- Cross-references
- cites 4 Code sections and 1 regulation; cited by 1
Corporation X and its wholly owned subsidiaries, corporations Y and Z, file a consolidated return for the calendar year 1971. None of the corporations have incurred exploration expenditures described in section 617 in previous years. During 1971, X incurred foreign exploration expenditures of $30,000, Y of $20,000, and Z of $40,000. The amount of foreign exploration expenditures deductible under section 617 for purposes of computing separate taxable income under § 1.1502-12 will be the amount actually expended by each corporation.
Assume the same facts as in example (1) except that prior to 1971, X, Y, and Z had deducted (or deferred) under section 615 and 617 a total of $300,000 of exploration expenditures. During 1971, with respect to deposits located outside the United States X incurred exploration expenditures of $25,000, Y of $75,000, and Z of $125,000. The consolidated exploration limitation under paragraph (a) of this section with respect to the foreign deposits (there is no limitation with respect to the domestic expenditures) is $100,000. X may allocate the $100,000 in any manner among the three members, except that X may not be allocated more than $25,000 nor Y more than $75,000, the amount actually expended by X and Y and which they could have deducted had they each filed a separate return. If the allocation is not made in accordance with paragraph (a)(2)(i) of this section, the $100,000 limitation will be allocated under paragraph (a)(2)(ii) of this section as follows:
| Corporation | Expenditure | Fraction | Limitation | Allocable portion | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25,000 | ||||||
| X | $25,000 | ————— | × | $100,000 | = | $12,500 |
| 200,000 | ||||||
| 75,000 | ||||||
| Y | $75,000 | ————— | × | $100,000 | = | $37,500 |
| 200,000 | ||||||
| 100,000 | ||||||
| Z | $125,000 | ————— | × | $100,000 | = | $50,000 |
| 200,000 |
The denominator of $200,000 was calculated as follows:
X = $25,000
Y = $75,000
Z = $100,000 (maximum amount allowed if filed separately)
Total $200,000.
Assume the same facts as in example (2) and that on January 1, 1971, X acquired all of the stock of corporation T which prior to its taxable year beginning January 1, 1971, had previously deducted (or deferred) $310,000 of exploration expenditures. Assume further that in 1971 X incurred $25,000 of foreign exploration expenditures, Y $50,000, T $50,000, and Z none. A consolidated return is filed for 1971. None of the expenditures may be deducted under section 617 since the consolidated exploration limitation is zero. The limitation is zero since the aggregate amount of previously deducted (or deferred) exploration expenditures by the members of the group exceeds $400,000. (The total of such expenditures is $410,000, of which $310,000 is attributable to T and, assuming the allocation of the limitation in example (2) is made under paragraph (a)(2)(ii) of this section, $12,500 is attributable to X, $37,500 to Y, and $50,000 to Z.
Assume the same facts as in example (3) except that on December 31, 1971, X sold all of the stock in Z to an unrelated party. The consolidated exploration limitation for 1972 will be $40,000, computed by subtracting from $400,000, the aggregate amount of previously deducted (or deferred) exploration expenditures incurred by the members of the group prior to 1972. (The total of such expenditures is $360,000, of which $12,500 is attributable to X, $37,500 to Y and $310,000 to T.) Amounts previously deducted (or deferred) by Z are not taken into account since it was not a member of the group at any time during 1972. Amounts previously deducted (or deferred) by Z shall be taken into account by it for subsequent separate return years.
[T.D. 7192, 37 FR 12949, June 30, 1972]
Cross-references
Computed from the citations in the text of 26 CFR.
Code sections it cites
- § 617 Deduction and recapture of certain mining exploration expenditures
- § 638 Continental shelf areas
- § 615 Repealed
- § 23 Adoption expenses
Regulations it cites
Cited by 1 other regulation
Amendment history
From the source citation at the end of the section, newest first. T.D. is a Treasury decision; FR is the Federal Register.
- Issued by T.D. 7192 (37 FR 12949)
Where it sits in 26 CFR
- Subchapter A Income tax
- Part 1 Income taxes
- Computation of Separate Taxable Income
Nearby sections
- § 1.1502-12 Separate taxable income.
- § 1.1502-13 Intercompany transactions.
- § 1.1502-14Z Application of opportunity zone rules to members of a consolidated group.
- § 1.1502-15 SRLY limitation on built-in losses.
- § 1.1502-16 Mine exploration expenditures.
- § 1.1502-17 Methods of accounting.
- § 1.1502-19 Excess loss accounts.