Treasury Regulations · 26 CFR
§ 1.993-3. Definition of export property.
Regulation text, no changes From the eCFR, current as of October 15, 2026. The eCFR is an authoritative but unofficial editorial compilation of the Code of Federal Regulations; the official text is the annual CFR on govinfo. Compare it with this section on ecfr.gov (external site) or the official annual CFR on govinfo (external site).
Regulation under 26 U.S.C. § 993
Cite as 26 CFR § 1.993-3
At a glance
Read from the text and its source citation. Not part of the regulation.
- Status
- In the current eCFR
- Issued
- October 17, 1977 by T.D. 7514
- Last amended
- November 17, 1982 by T.D. 7854
- Issued under
- 26 U.S.C. § 993
- Length
- 8,479 words · about 37 min to read
- Defines
- 6 terms
- Cross-references
- cites 7 Code sections and 4 regulations; cited by 6
(a) The cost of goods sold or inventory amount of such person for such property is such property is sold or held for sale, or
(b) The adjusted basis of such person for such property, as determined in accordance with the provisions of section 1011, if such property is held for lease or leased.
The value of parts provided pursuant to a services contract, as described in § 1.993-1 (d)(4)(v), is not taken into account in applying this subdivision.
(a) Within the United States to a carrier or freight forwarder for ultimate delivery outside the United States to a purchaser or lessee (or to a subsequent purchaser or sublessee),
(b) Within the United States to a purchaser or lessee, if such property is ultimately delivered, directly used, or directly consumed outside the United States (including delivery to a carrier or freight forwarder for delivery outside the United States) by the purchaser or lessee (or a subsequent purchaser or sublessee) within 1 year after such sale or lease,
(c) Within or outside the United States to a purchaser or lessee which, at the time of the sale or lease, is a DISC and is not a member of the same controlled group (as defined in § 1.993-1(k)) as the seller or lessor,
(d) From the United States to the purchaser or lessee (or a subsequent purchaser or sublessee) at a point outside the United States by means of a ship, aircraft, or other delivery vehicle, owned, leased, or chartered by the seller or lessor,
(e) Outside the United States to a purchaser or lessee from a warehouse, a storage facility, or assembly site located outside the United States, if such property was previously shipped by such seller or lessor from the United States, or
(f) Outside the United States to a purchaser or lessee if such property was previously shipped by such seller or lessor from the United States and if such property is located outside the United States pursuant to a prior lease by the seller or lessor, and either (1) such prior lease terminated at the expiration of its term (or by the action of the prior lessee acting alone), (2) the sale occurred or the term of the subsequent lease began after the time at which the term of the prior lease would have expired, or (3) the lessee under the subsequent lease is not a related person (as defined in § 1.993-1(a)(6)) with respect to the lessor and the prior lease was terminated by the action of the lessor (acting alone or together with the lessee).
(a) A facsimile or carbon copy of the export bill of lading issued by the carrier who delivers the property,
(b) A certificate of an agent or representative of the carrier disclosing delivery of the property outside the United States,
(c) A facsimile or carbon copy of the certificate of lading for the property executed by a customs officer of the country to which the property is delivered,
(d) If such country has no customs administration, a written statement by the person to whom delivery outside the United States was made,
(e) A facsimile or carbon copy of the shipper's export declaration, a monthly shipper's summary declaration filed with the Bureau of Customs, or a magnetic tape filed in lieu of the Shipper's Export Declaration, covering the property,
(f) Any other proof (including evidence as to the nature of the property or the nature of the transaction) which establishes to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the property was ultimately delivered, or directly sold, or directly consumed outside the United States within 1 year after the sale or lease.
(a) Under subdivisions (ii) through (iv) of this subparagraph is not sold for ultimate use in the United States or
(b) Under subdivision (v) of this subparagraph is leased for ultimate use outside the United States.
(a) Such purchaser is a related person (as defined in § 1.993-1(a)(6)) with respect to the seller and such purchaser ultimately uses such property, or a second product into which such property is incorporated as a component, in the United States.
(b) At the time of the sale, there is an agreement or understanding that such property, or a second product into which such property is incorporated as a component, will be ultimately used by the purchaser in the United States.
(c) At the time of the sale, a reasonable person would have believed that such property or such second product would be ultimately used by such purchaser in the United States unless, in the case of a sale of components, the fair market value of such components at the time of delivery to the purchaser constitutes less than 20 percent of the fair market value of the second product into which such components are incorporated (determined at the time of completion of the production, manufacture or assembly of such second product).
For purposes of (b) of this subdivision, there is an agreement or understanding that property will ultimately be used in the United States if, for example, a component is sold abroad under an express agreement with the foreign purchaser that the component is to be incorporated into a product to be sold back to the United States. As a further example there would also be such an agreement or understanding if the foreign purchaser indicated at the time of the sale or previously that the component is to be incorporated into a product which is designed principally for the United States market. However, such an agreement or understanding does not result from the mere fact that a second product, into which components exported from the United States have been incorporated and which is sold on the world market, is sold in substantial quantities in the United States.
(b) The provisions of (a) of this subdivision may be illustrated by the following example:
Assume that a manufacturer produces a total of 20,000 electronic devices. The manufacturer exports 5,000 of the devices and subsequently sells 11,000 of the devices to a DISC which exports the 11,000 devices. The major single component article in each device is a tube which represents 60 percent of the fair market value of the device at the time the device is sold by the manufacturer. The manufacturer imports 8,000 of the tubes and produces the remaining 12,000 tubes. For purposes of this subdivision, in accordance with the substitution principle used in the customs drawback laws, the 5,000 devices exported by the manufacturer are each treated as containing an imported tube because the devices were exported prior to the sale to the DISC. The remaining 3,000 imported tubes are treated as being contained in the first 3,000 devices purchased and exported by the DISC. Thus, since the 50 percent test is not met with respect to the first 3,000 devices purchased and exported by the DISC, those devices are not export property. The remaining 8,000 devices purchased and exported by the DISC are treated as containing tubes produced in United States, and those devices are export property (if they otherwise meet the requirements of this section).
(a) Such property is held for sublease, or is subleased, by such person to a third person for the ultimate use of such third person;
(b) Such third person is not a member of the same controlled group; and
(c) Such property is used predominantly outside the United States by such third person.
(a) Volatile products,
(b) Light oils such as motor fuel and kerosene,
(c) Distillates such as naphtha,
(d) Lubricating oils,
(e) Greases and waxes, and
(f) Residues such as fuel oil.
For purposes of this paragraph, a product or commodity derived from shale oil which would be a primary product from oil if derived from crude oil is considered a primary product from oil.
(a) Natural gas,
(b) Condensates,
(c) Liquefied petroleum gases such as ethane, propane, and butane, and
(d) Liquid products such as natural gasoline.
(a) Coke,
(b) Coke-oven gas,
(c) Gas liquor,
(d) Crude light oil, and
(e) Coal tar.
(a) Uranium hexafluoride,
(b) Enriched uranium hexafluoride,
(c) Uranium metal,
(d) Uranium compounds, such as uranium carbide,
(e) Uranium dioxide, and
(f) Plutonium fuels.
(a) Its manufacturing and processing costs (that is, the portion of the cost of goods sold or inventory amount of the product or commodity attributable to the aggregate cost of manufacturing or processing each mineral contained therein) equal or exceed—
(b) An amount equal to either of the following:
(a) The excess of its fair market value on the date it is sold, exchanged, or otherwise disposed of (or, if not sold, exchanged, or otherwise disposed of, the last day of the DISC's taxable year) over the portion thereof properly allocable to excluded processes other than extracting is equal to or greater than
(b) Twice the aggregate of the fair market value at the cutoff point for each mineral contained in such product or commodity.
For purposes of this subdivision (v), the fair market value of a product or commodity on the date it is sold, exchanged, or otherwise disposed of is the price at which it is disposed of, subject to any adjustment that may be required under the arm's length standard of section 482 and the regulations thereunder. If such product or commodity is not sold, exchanged, or otherwise disposed of, then, for purposes of section 992(a)(1)(B) (relating to the 95-percent test with respect to qualified export assets), the fair market value of a product or commodity on the last day of the DISC's taxable year is the arm's length price at which such product or commodity would have been sold on such date, determined by applying the principles of section 482 and the regulations thereunder.
(a) The cutoff point is the point at which gross income from the property (within the meaning of section 613(a)) was in fact determined.
(b) The cost at the cutoff point is deemed to be the amount of the gross income from the property of the taxpayer eligible for a depletion deduction with respect to the mineral.
(c) The fair market value at the cutoff point is deemed to be the amount of the gross income from the property of the taxpayer eligible for a depletion deduction with respect to the mineral, except that, if (1) the fair market value of a product or commodity on the date specified in subdivision (v)(a) of this subparagraph exceeds the aggregate of the fair market value at the cutoff point for each mineral contained therein and (2) 10 percent or more of such excess is attributable to a net increase in the fair market values of such minerals by reason of factors other than manufacturing or processing or the application of excluded processes (such as, for example, increases in the fair market values of some minerals by reason of inflation or speculation exceed decreases in such values of other minerals by reason of deflation or speculation), then the aggregate of the fair market value at the cutoff point for each such mineral shall be increased to reflect the net excess so attributable.
(d) The provisions of this subdivision (vi) are illustrated by the following example.
An integrated manufacturer, X, on February 1, 1976, had gross income from the property (within the meaning of section 613(a)) of $50 with respect to a specified volume of a mineral. Thus, the cost at the cutoff point of the mineral was $50. X converted the mineral into a product which it sold on July 15, 1976, for $75. Of the $25 excess of the selling price over the gross income from the property, $23 was attributable to manufacturing, processing, and the application or excluded processes, and $2 was attributable to an increase in the fair market value of the mineral due to inflation between February 1 and July 15, 1976. Since only 8 percent of such excess ($2/$25) was attributable to factors other than manufacturing, processing, and the application of excluded processes, the fair market value at the cutoff point of the mineral is $50. However, had $3 of the $25 excess, or 12 percent, been attributable to an increase in the fair market value of the mineral due to inflation, then the fair market value at the cutoff point of the mineral would be $53.
(a) The fair market value of the waste product or byproduct containing the depletable product, determined as of the date the byproduct or waste product is recovered, or
(b) The amount the cost at the cut-off point would be for a depletable product of like kind and grade which is extracted, determined as of the date the byproduct or waste product is recovered.
For purposes of (b) of this subdivision the cutoff point for the depletable product of like kind and grade is deemed to be the point at which gross income from the property would be determined if such depletable product were sold by the taxpayer eligible to take a deduction for depletion after the completion of all mining processes applied to the depletable product and before the application of any nonmining process.
(b) In cases in which satisfaction of either the cost test or the fair market value test is not reasonably obvious, a DISC will be required to substantiate the gross income from the property properly allocable to each depletable product in a product or commodity and either all costs or fair market values relied upon the DISC.
(c) For purposes of substantiating (1) gross income from the property properly allocable to a depletable product, (2) costs, and (3) fair market values, the DISC and related supplier shall each identify items in (or that were in) inventory in the same manner each used to identify items in inventory for purposes of computing Federal income tax.
For purposes of this paragraph and subparagraph (6) of this paragraph, the date of a sale, exchange, or other disposition of a product or commodity is the date as of which title to such product or commodity passes. The accounting method of a person is not determinative of the date of a sale, exchange, or other disposition.
(a) With respect to any such product or commodity not owned by a DISC, to sales, exchanges, other dispositions, or leases made after March 18, 1975, with respect to which the DISC derives gross receipts.
(b) With respect to any such product or commodity acquired by a DISC after March 18, 1975, and
(c) With respect to any such product or commodity owned by a DISC on March 18, 1975, to sales, exchanges, other dispositions, and leases made after March 18, 1976, and to owning such product or commodity after such date.
[T.D. 7514, 42 FR 55461, Oct. 17, 1977, as amended by T.D. 7513, 42 FR 57309, Nov. 2, 1977; T.D. 7854, 47 FR 51740, Nov. 17, 1982]
Terms defined here
Where the text says “the term … means”. Select a term to jump to its definition.
Cross-references
Computed from the citations in the text of 26 CFR.
Code sections it cites
- § 993 Definitions and special rules
- § 1011 Adjusted basis for determining gain or loss
- § 4262 Definition of taxable transportation
- § 402 Taxability of beneficiary of employees’ trust
- § 613 Percentage depletion
- § 482 Allocation of income and deductions among taxpayers
- § 992 Requirements of a domestic international sales corporation
Regulations it cites
- § 1.993-1 Definition of qualified export receipts.
- § 1.992-2 Election to be treated as a DISC.
- § 1.993-7 Definition of United States.
- § 1.613-4 Gross income from the property in the case of minerals other than oil and gas.
Cited by 6 other regulations
- § 1.992-3 Deficiency distributions to meet qualification requirements.
- § 1.993-1 Definition of qualified export receipts.
- § 1.993-2 Definition of qualified export assets.
- § 1.993-4 Definition of producer's loans.
- § 1.994-2 Marginal costing rules.
- § 1.995-5 Foreign investment attributable to producer's loans.
Amendment history
From the source citation at the end of the section, newest first. T.D. is a Treasury decision; FR is the Federal Register.
- Amended by T.D. 7854 (47 FR 51740)
- Amended by T.D. 7513 (42 FR 57309)
- Issued by T.D. 7514 (42 FR 55461)
Where it sits in 26 CFR
- Subchapter A Income tax
- Part 1 Income taxes
- Domestic International Sales Corporations
Nearby sections
- § 1.992-3 Deficiency distributions to meet qualification requirements.
- § 1.992-4 Coordination with personal holding company provisions in case of certain produced film rents.
- § 1.993-1 Definition of qualified export receipts.
- § 1.993-2 Definition of qualified export assets.
- § 1.993-3 Definition of export property.
- § 1.993-4 Definition of producer's loans.
- § 1.993-5 Definition of related foreign export corporation.
- § 1.993-6 Definition of gross receipts.
- § 1.993-7 Definition of United States.