Treasury Regulations · 26 CFR
§ 301.6224(c)-3. Consistent settlements.
Regulation text, no changes From the eCFR, current as of October 15, 2026. The eCFR is an authoritative but unofficial editorial compilation of the Code of Federal Regulations; the official text is the annual CFR on govinfo. Compare it with this section on ecfr.gov (external site) or the official annual CFR on govinfo (external site).
Cite as 26 CFR § 301.6224(c)-3
At a glance
Read from the text and its source citation. Not part of the regulation.
- Status
- In the current eCFR
- Issued
- October 4, 2001 by T.D. 8965
- Length
- 1,079 words · about 5 min to read
- Cross-references
- cites 1 Code section and 0 regulations; cited by 0
The Internal Revenue Service seeks to disallow a $100,000 loss reported by Partnership P $20,000 of which was allocated to partner X, and $10,000 of which was allocated to partner Y. The Internal Revenue Service agrees to a settlement with X in which the Internal Revenue Service allows $12,000 of the loss, accepts the treatment of all other partnership items on the partnership return, and imposes a penalty for negligence related to the $8,000 loss disallowance. Partner Y requests settlement terms consistent with the settlement made between X and the Internal Revenue Service. The items are partnership items (or a related penalty) for X immediately before X enters into the settlement agreement and are partnership items (or a related penalty) for Y at the time of the request. The Internal Revenue Service must offer Y settlement terms allowing a $6,000 loss, a negligence penalty on the $4,000 disallowance, and otherwise reflecting the treatment of partnership items on the partnership return.
F files inconsistently with Partnership P and reports the inconsistency. The Internal Revenue Service notifies F that it will treat all partnership items arising from P as nonpartnership items with respect to F. Later, the Internal Revenue Service enters into a settlement with F on these items. The Internal Revenue Service is not required to offer the other partners of P settlement terms consistent with the settlement reached between F and the Internal Revenue Service because the items arising from P are not partnership items with respect to F.
G, a partner in Partnership P, filed suit under section 6228(b) after the Internal Revenue Service failed to allow an administrative adjustment request with respect to a partnership item arising from P for a taxable year. Under section 6231(b)(1)(B), the partnership items of G for the partnership taxable year became nonpartnership items as of the date G filed suit. After G filed suit, another partner and the Internal Revenue Service entered into a settlement agreement with respect to items arising from P in that year. G is not entitled to consistent settlement terms because, at the time of the settlement, the items arising from P are no longer partnership items with respect to G.
[T.D. 8965, 66 FR 50552, Oct. 4, 2001]
Cross-references
Computed from the citations in the text of 26 CFR.
Code sections it cites
Amendment history
From the source citation at the end of the section, newest first. T.D. is a Treasury decision; FR is the Federal Register.
- Issued by T.D. 8965 (66 FR 50552)
Where it sits in 26 CFR
- Subchapter F Procedure and administration
- Part 301 Procedure and administration
- Subpart ECFR01918753cdbe68b Assessment
- In General
Nearby sections
- § 301.6224(a)-1 Participation in administrative proceedings.
- § 301.6224(b)-1 Partner may waive rights.
- § 301.6224(c)-1 Tax matters partner may bind nonnotice partners.
- § 301.6224(c)-2 Pass-thru partner binds indirect partners.
- § 301.6224(c)-3 Consistent settlements.
- § 301.6225-1 Partnership adjustment by the Internal Revenue Service.
- § 301.6225-2 Modification of imputed underpayment.
- § 301.6225-3 Treatment of partnership adjustments that do not result in an imputed underpayment.
- § 301.6226-1 Election for an alternative to the payment of the imputed underpayment.